Crossposted at Intersection of Madness & Reality.
I made a deal with myself, that I’d vet my battles a bit more thoroughly and not get worked up about the continued racial micro-aggressions and misogynoir©Moya Bailey that seems to grace my social media timelines at every turn, as of late, for my own peace of mind. Trying to bob and weave around the proverbial blows of isms, becomes exasperating; so I offer my thoughts as often or as little as I feel like it, or not at all... at least not publicly... or will reserve them for personal conversations among the safety of friends, supporters, and family.
A new year is upon us,
but the ratchetry of anti-black foolery, sexism and the anonymity the
internet provides for many continue to thrive. To be clear, social media
isn't to blame for racism or for ‘making people racist.' Technology has merely
made it easier to illuminate the dark side of people’s thoughts. The curtain has been yanked open to expose regular folks, celebrities,
leaders, and media personalities that should know better but who choose not
to do better, which is why I no longer assign ‘ignorance’ as an excuse to
absolve anti-blackness and racially charged sexism, because I believe that kind
of sociopathy to be deliberate and intentional. For instance …
Madonna endearingly
tagging her white son Rocco as #disnigga on Instagram —
despite having adopted two black children —, being defiant about it during the height of
the backlash before finally deleting it , and then whitesplaining her way through an apology,
isn't ignorance. It’s the
willful obtuseness of a wealthy, middle-aged white woman, operating under the
influence of ‘who gon’ check me boo?’ levels
of arrogance and privilege, with no regard for how the N-word could possibly
impact the lives of her black children.
Using the killing of
an unarmed black teenager as a rhetorical device, to menace and dismiss an
educated black athlete as a thug who deserves
to be killed, for daring to exhibit the bombast that’s common in
sports (especially after a win), wasn't a mere misstep made by a bumbling
Twitter user. It was a scary illustration of what happens when black people, particularly athletes, dare
to openly relish the euphoric feeling of triumph, lest we come off as being too
‘uppity’, and offend the sensibilities of 'whiteness'... Because, apparently, white
people are the only ones allowed experience the full range of emotions.
This level of
vitriolic fervor is also prevalent whenever black people gain access to spaces
often reserved for white elites: noted with the Obamas' occupation of the White
House, Oprah Winfrey's interest in buying an expensive purse while shopping in
Switzerland, with Cecile Kyenge occupying a seat in Italian
Parliament, and with Christiane Taubira's appointment as Minister of
Justice of France.
The nastiness,
apologetics, and racism that ensued during Ani DiFranco-gate, was far
more troubling than just impassioned fans speaking up on behalf of the
singer and her poor decision making and insensitivity.
... I could go on,
because the sheer volume of it all (in 2014... still) has been too
overwhelming, at times, to process; and akin to over-stuffing one’s self at an
elaborate buffet... it’s a heavy, bloated feeling. It makes me leery of people,
places, and motives that could, potentially, be a threat to my humanity as a black
woman.
That disclosure and
brief list of infractions aside, every now and again something surfaces that
even I can’t avoid having to openly lend a ‘WTF’ to.
Yesterday, on the day
of commemoration for Dr. Martin Luther King, a Russian magazine called Buro
24/7 decided to publish a story about Dasha Zhukova— heiress, art
investor, and editor-in-chief of the fashion magazine, Garage. The accompanying
photo features a pouty-mouthed Zhukova, staring pensively into the camera,
while perched on a chair sculpture (designed by NY-based Norwegian artist, Bjarne Melgaard) of
a half-naked black woman-mannequin, folded over on its back, legs in the air.
Keeping in line with
the long-held trend of desecrating and using black women’s bodies for science, for the amusement
of the white gaze, and as props to accentuate white womanhood — ahem, Miley, Lily, … and others— the image is
unsettling and, as Fashion Bomb Daily’s Clair Sulmers suggested, conveys a white
woman who “appears the total opposite of the compromised black woman on
the floor. The message: white dominance and superiority, articulated in a
seemingly serene yet overtly degrading way.”
Zhukova apologized for
her participation in the spread, conceding that its publication on MLK Day was
ill-timed and offered: “I regret allowing an artwork with such charged
meaning to be used in this context. I utterly abhor racism and would like to
apologize to those offended by my participation in this shoot. Garage
Magazine has a strong track record of promoting diversity and racial
and gender equality in the worlds of art and fashion, and will continue in our
mission to stir positive debate on these and other issues.”
Apparently, modern
society, specifically the fashion and art world (which often collide and
collude with one another) still hasn't figured out how not to (mis)use black and brown bodies toconvey its message. While the chairs are also sculpted in images of
non-black female bodies, it still doesn't negate the impact of the casual
racism and sexism of the one used in the Buro 24/7 pictorial
(the magazine’s response was to crop the picture down, on their website), nor
does it erase the continued disregard for black women and black bodies.
It's becoming
tenuous to exist, express one's self, and navigate spaces (virtual and in
3D) as a black woman. As much as I want to sequester myself away from the
racist sentiments and sexism that's seeming to become par for the course in
this social networking age, it’s important to continue to take up as much space
as possible, without needing to serve as objects to prop up, pacify, or
amuse others. Black people deserve to tout successes, and just safely be,
without incident.
No comments
Post a Comment